Johnny Seraph wrote:@Aprophis

Good points, but here's where I have to go, hmmm...

Consider human marriage. That's supposedly the ultimate version of human love, in all possible manifestations. But if God doesn't do love "that" way, isn't that something less than all-loving?

Because that would mean that marital love includes more possible versions of love than Divine love does, wouldn't it? I mean, if earthly marital love encompasses eros, philos, and agape, but Divine love only involves the latter two...

See what I'm getting at? 1ey

We're not necessarily talking about divine. Angels are celestials. Demons can be divine too, Greek gods are divine too.
Celestial means that it's far away from Earthen things. Where you move away from the physical and become more abstract, going into concepts.
Also asexual people can marry. They just don't do the naughty. So I don't really know why you're associating this with marriage itself. Just because good Christians marry to procreate?
I guess it comes down to what I mentioned before, humans so like to get under the sheets.

I had an amorous congress with my Sterling angel twice, which shocked me a lot. And my human spirit lover wasn't even jealous at all because they are best friends.

CatVictoriam wrote:Youtube is for entertainment, not for learning stuff, but I give up trying to help. Do whatever you think is right :x

YouTube can also be for learning (though most of the time it's for entertainment). It just depends on what kind of channel are you watching. YouTube can be educational. Peace.