Is that common, for conjurers to "check up" on spirits/entities once they're bound to someone? Personally, I'm not sure I like that. Feels like an invasion of privacy. Not that I'm harming mine in any way but I think I might be more than a little annoyed to know someone is "looking over my shoulder", with or without my knowledge. And even if the conjurer says they dont, they already said they did so I wouldn't necessarily trust their word.

Sent from my SM-J100VPP using Tapatalk

Rubyluv wrote:Is that common, for conjurers to "check up" on spirits/entities once they're bound to someone? Personally, I'm not sure I like that. Feels like an invasion of privacy. Not that I'm harming mine in any way but I think I might be more than a little annoyed to know someone is "looking over my shoulder", with or without my knowledge. And even if the conjurer says they dont, they already said they did so I wouldn't necessarily trust their word.

Sent from my SM-J100VPP using Tapatalk

I'd actually never heard of conjurers dong such a thing before, that is, until this seller showed up.

Empress M wrote:

Rubyluv wrote:Is that common, for conjurers to "check up" on spirits/entities once they're bound to someone? Personally, I'm not sure I like that. Feels like an invasion of privacy. Not that I'm harming mine in any way but I think I might be more than a little annoyed to know someone is "looking over my shoulder", with or without my knowledge. And even if the conjurer says they dont, they already said they did so I wouldn't necessarily trust their word.

Sent from my SM-J100VPP using Tapatalk

I'd actually never heard of conjurers dong such a thing before, that is, until this seller showed up.

Thanks for clarifying. I was under the same impression. You pay for a conjurer's services, you get your being, and it's between you and your being. Unless, of course, you ASK for mediation. And even then, I was under the impression that you're offered advice and you handle it yourself. Not answering to an "overseer", as such.

Sent from my SM-J100VPP using Tapatalk

Nothing I've ever seen on ANY conjurer's site mentioned anything of this nature, nor did any listing I ever saw specify the conjurer as anyone other than the person listing said being so I was confused.

Sent from my SM-J100VPP using Tapatalk

...Just throwing this out there, but it's possible for beings, usually servitors, to be used to spy on people through a psionic network of sorts...like living security cameras.

This has nothing to do with this seller in particular, just saying that it's possible.

Still, WHAT THE HECK, YOU KILLED AN ALPHA!!!??

Ok, enough of this.

Rubyluv, you've nothing to fear your original thoughts on these matters were correct. However, dragynraken was/is new and insecure in his abilities. I'm not defending or excusing him in any way, that is just the way it is, plain and simple.

Doomguy, I'd suggest you contact DLM if you'd like to give condolences, air frustration, or receive clarification on the matter as both Empress and dragynraken are biased and mostly uninformed on the on the subject.

Because of the nature of his thoughtforms he had to keep checking on them to basically refuel them.
He is working out that issue now so that he can offer creations that will not need the constant connection and energy. He wanted to be able to quickly offer changes to the creations and that can't be done as easily with a stable not connected being.
This was a learning experience for him and he is taking the right steps to correct it.

Also like Rai said when it comes to the alpha problem enough has been said on the forum let the topic die on here.

Sorry; new here and learning. Stirring up not my intention. Just confused.

Sent from my SM-J100VPP using Tapatalk

Don't worry Rubyluv, you didn't do anything wrong. Always question what you don't know or understand.

Thank you, Ravechaosnight! So many knowledgeable people here; getting quite an education!

Sent from my SM-J100VPP using Tapatalk