You're welcome, on the book.souldeep91 wrote: Tue Oct 13, 2026 9:25 pm If you look at my education, I'm a scientist too.
I think hardly anybody runs statistical analyses with as much euophoria as I do. I love good evidence why things are exactly as they are, and it's beautiful if you can prove it.
And it's also beautiful if you can't, and it still exists, lol. But it's a bit of a lost argument on people with a "moe closed" mindset. If they would say stuff like:
"Can you prove that God or Unicorns exist?" then, no, I cannot prove it. You can prove it to yourself if you put some work in, but I can certainly not prove it to you.
I think we haven't reached the age, yet, where it becomes clear to the majority of people that some stuff has to be proved by others and some things you can only prove to yourself.
If I wand to bring out a new medical drug, then I better prove its effectiveness before selling it to the public. It's my responsibility to prove the effectiveness and safety.
But if we are talking about other dimensions, and >3D beings etc. sorry, it's on you to unlock your mind to see. I cannot make you see something, you don't want to see.
It also doesn't mean that everything that cannot be usually seen or measured does exist. But that is the point, you have to see for yourself what you are able to discern as real. In the end everybody lives in their own reality anyways. We just sometimes agree that some stuff is experienced by (almost) everyone. If that is real, who knows. We could collectively be making it up or be mistaken.
Thank for the book suggestion: "The Noetic Universe" by Dean Radin
One thing I find interesting is that in-the-public-eye scientists - the ones who try to improve people's understanding of science - is they sometimes explain that nothing can be proven absolutely. Widely accepted scientific theories are just scientists' best theory for now, often their best approximation of what's true...until it's disproved or a better theory comes along, or the theory is adjusted to fit new understanding. That's what they explain.
That's pretty much the same as we're all doing throughout our lives. Making sense of things. I think it's also called the theory of knowledge.
Paranormally sceptic scientists are expressing their belief system. But they admit they can neither disprove - nor can anyone 100% prove - the existence of psi. It simply doesn't feature prominently in their belief system.
In the end, what we all fall back on is our experience and what it means to each of us individually. Meaning (significance) is important.
