Page 1 of 1

True or not, you decide

Posted: Wed Jun 10, 2015 2:57 pm
by darklordmidnight
This article purports to have found the skeletal remains of Black Shuck.
I will let you all decide what you think.
Be it true or not, it is still a cool article.
http://locklip.com/7-foot-tall-hellhoun ... astery-uk/

Re: True or not, you decide

Posted: Wed Jun 10, 2015 5:28 pm
by Jumbo
A 7 foot tall dog is a very huge hight.....there are actually dogs in real life that have been known to grow to absurd hights, like potentially over 5 foot. So it's not certain that this was black shuck.
Also, a find this big would have been reported on a more major news site, which makes me a little sceptical when i think about it.
Nevertheless, it's a cool story and i want it to be true.

Re: True or not, you decide

Posted: Wed Jun 10, 2015 5:33 pm
by Satan and Suns
That is a really cool story! I would hope it would be true too :)

Re: True or not, you decide

Posted: Thu Jun 11, 2015 2:58 am
by Instrument of the end fire083
It will be interesting to see what happens with this story as time goes on.

Re: True or not, you decide

Posted: Thu Jun 11, 2015 4:15 am
by Gracefull
When my 200 lb Dane stands on his hind feet he can see over a six foot fence ~

Re: True or not, you decide

Posted: Thu Jun 11, 2015 8:21 am
by Anteros
Interesting story.
I have no problem believing that.
There are numerous reports of "embarrassing" skeletons found all over the world that proves that official history as taught in classrooms around the world is utter rubbish.
I read that in your country the Smithsonian makes it their mission to round up all of these giant skeletons "for further examination" and then they never see the light of day again!!!
The most popular example of this is of course the Nephilim.
Some of the images on the web are clearly fakes but not all of them.

The ruling elite love and promote official history as it is another way of keeping people in the dark about what we really are and it cuts us off from higher consciousness.
Charles Darwin is their poster boy in this regard.

Re: True or not, you decide

Posted: Thu Jun 11, 2015 1:55 pm
by GreySkyMorning
WhimsicalSage wrote:Also, a find this big would have been reported on a more major news site, which makes me a little sceptical when i think about it.
Nooooot necessarily. It involves the paranormal, and Black Shuck also isn't as well known as, say, simply ghosts. I'd never heard about Black Shuck until this article. That combined with the fact that it could, potentially, just be a really big dog, and the whole paranormal thing, tends to put that out of the bigger new's minds.

Big news cares little about the paranormal unless the situation is loud, noticeable, and much harder to explain than a large canine's skeleton.

Re: True or not, you decide

Posted: Thu Jun 11, 2015 5:25 pm
by Jumbo
GreySkyMorning wrote:
WhimsicalSage wrote:Also, a find this big would have been reported on a more major news site, which makes me a little sceptical when i think about it.
Nooooot necessarily. It involves the paranormal, and Black Shuck also isn't as well known as, say, simply ghosts. I'd never heard about Black Shuck until this article. That combined with the fact that it could, potentially, just be a really big dog, and the whole paranormal thing, tends to put that out of the bigger new's minds.

Big news cares little about the paranormal unless the situation is loud, noticeable, and much harder to explain than a large canine's skeleton.
I know they don't care about the paranormal, but i wasn't thinking about it from a paranormal perspective. I was suggesting that from an archaelogical persective. :thumbup:
Being that it's a big find and if they thought it was potentially a legendary dog, i would have thought a bigger archaeological news site would have reported something about it. That's what i meant.
For all i know, they have though, somewhere. I haven't actually researched it.

Re: True or not, you decide

Posted: Thu Jun 11, 2015 5:43 pm
by Magemoss
WhimsicalSage wrote:
GreySkyMorning wrote:
WhimsicalSage wrote:Also, a find this big would have been reported on a more major news site, which makes me a little sceptical when i think about it.
Nooooot necessarily. It involves the paranormal, and Black Shuck also isn't as well known as, say, simply ghosts. I'd never heard about Black Shuck until this article. That combined with the fact that it could, potentially, just be a really big dog, and the whole paranormal thing, tends to put that out of the bigger new's minds.

Big news cares little about the paranormal unless the situation is loud, noticeable, and much harder to explain than a large canine's skeleton.
I know they don't care about the paranormal, but i wasn't thinking about it from a paranormal perspective. I was suggesting that from an archaelogical persective. :thumbup:
Being that it's a big find and if they thought it was potentially a legendary dog, i would have thought a bigger archaeological news site would have reported something about it. That's what i meant.
For all i know, they have though, somewhere. I haven't actually researched it.
The wikipedia page for Black Shuck has a couple of links to news articles talking about it, so it's legit. Must have been a big dog.